Thursday, December 9, 2010

Old People Talking About Video Games and Upcoming Events

The Governator is at it again. California state legislature is trying its hand at regulating video games. The state recently passed a law prohibiting sale of "violent video games" to anyone under the age 18. Furthermore, such games are required to sport a 2" square "18" sticker. There a lot of things about this issue that just burn me, but then I do see a little sense here.

First of all, as this law goes under the Supreme Court for a decision, the attorney for EMA is quoting the First Amendment to show the unconstitutionality of Ahnold's law. Really, that is what this boils down to on a legal scale. Our nation was founded on the idea that people are free to express themselves and make a buck. Granted, this has been modified to ensure that making a buck doesn't involve enslaving entire cultures, but you get the idea. Prohibiting the sale of violent video games spits on the spirit of the First Amendment. For one person to say, "You can't sell this to certain people," when no hard evidence of detrimental effects exists is totally against the Constitution however you look at it.

Now you might say, "What about the age limits on alcohol and driver's licenses?" Alcohol is scientifically proven to alter and damage brain cells. And putting 12-year olds behind the wheel of 1.5 tons of metal and rubber which zoom along at 55 mph is just a disaster waiting to happen. A recent study was released (unfortunately I don't have a link to it at this time) in Australia that states that there is simply no conclusive evidence that people (adults and kids alike) are any more likely to be violent than other forms of media. Keep in mind, this is coming from Australia, a country infamous for banning violent games like Left 4 Dead 2. Also notice that this study doesn't dismiss media as a whole as a non-factor in violent influences; it states that video games are no more or less likely to foster violent tendencies.

At this point, I want to say that I do see some value in restricting the sale of graphic media. We already have that to some degree: pr0n. Really, this is just video and print media deemed too graphic for the public. So, we have age limits on it. Fine. I'm all for keeping kids away from some of the crazy things people consider to be "fun" behind closed doors. I don't think anyone will argue with that. Why not apply this to other forms of media just in new ways? I don't really see anything wrong with having to ID people for R-rated movies, explicit music, and Mature-rated video games. I used to scoff at the local EB Games manager at the mall when I was 16, but I understood the reason at least. All in all, I see no problem in trying to protect the youngin's. However, I think California's going about it the wrong way.

I remember my parents sitting down with me when I was about 12 or 13 when I was going over to a friend's house to watch some movies. Some of these movies were rated "R" and they knew it. They were not going with me and they knew there would not be any adults around. They sat me down and said, "You realize that whatever you see in these movies is all fake and you should never do them, right? Do you also know better than to use the bad language in those movies, too?" I did. And honestly, coming from a family that never really hammered these sorts of things home, this one moment really stuck with me.

Ultimately, while I see the pros of limiting sale of and attendance to questionable media, I uphold the First Amendment more. This means that such limitations, while noble, are unconstitutional. It really comes down to parents. Parents need to understand what their kids are in to and what that means. That goes for video games, music, movies, fashions, etc. I, as a parent, do not plan to let my daughter play M-rated games when she's 14 unless I know she realizes the difference between them and reality. Nor will I let her go to R-rated movies for the same reason. And, really, the bigger idea here is that media is largely rated already so people know what they are getting into. If parents have a problem with what their kids are playing or watching, take some accountability as the child's guardian and don't just blame the people who are making such things. Laws should not have to be made about this.

Speaking of violent video games, watch the episode of Penn & Teller: Bulls**t about video games. Here's Part 1, Part 2 and Part 3 on youtube. It's cynical, but I think you'll find it eye-opening.

And Now For Something Relatively Different:

Spike's VMA awards are Saturday night. Let's watch as God of War 3 and Mass Effect 2 steal all of the awards. There also seem to be a good handful of game/trailer reveals coming as well. Uncharted 3 was announced today with a trailer debuting during the awards. We'll also get to find out what that damn picture BioWare released was all about. So, stay tuned. We'll discuss afterward.

Gnome, out.

No comments:

Post a Comment